Magister Rorhbacher says: I think it is very vague to say that the historical references "give a sense of cultural identity and authenticity." What does it mean to have a sense of cultural authenticity from reading stuff about Roman history? How do you understand this process to work? I do think you're right that A. serves as a model of Roman-ness, but... By making the epic about Roman history, Vergil makes A. bigger than just a character, in some way representative of...
What I currently have is: Historical references such as these would serve to give the Roman reader a sense of cultural identity and authenticity, and the character of Aeneas, thus, serves as an important model for some of the most ideal Roman attributes.
What does it mean to have a sense of cultural authenticity from reading stuff about Roman history? I think perhaps I mean authenticity sans "cultural." I think for a Roman reader, the details and allusions to Roman history and culture would make the work feel very "real," kind of the way Sandman feels to me: rich in detail and setting, but so deeply "true" that I can accept it as presented. As history.
How do you understand this process to work? I think that for the most part this process is very subconscious. As a person is reading, these fine details accumulate over the course of the epic. In building, they create a recognizable world for the reader, a world that however mythical or surreal also has they key elements of "reality" which reflect the reader's world.
By making the epic about Roman history, Virgil makes Aeneas bigger than just a character, in some way representative of...
For a Roman reader, historical references such as these not only enrich the story and setting, but add a level of realism that roots the mythology of the Aeneid in the tangible world of the reader.
I have emailed this new sentence to Rohrbacher to see if I need to add things. Mrao.
What I currently have is: Historical references such as these would serve to give the Roman reader a sense of cultural identity and authenticity, and the character of Aeneas, thus, serves as an important model for some of the most ideal Roman attributes.
What does it mean to have a sense of cultural authenticity from reading stuff about Roman history? I think perhaps I mean authenticity sans "cultural." I think for a Roman reader, the details and allusions to Roman history and culture would make the work feel very "real," kind of the way Sandman feels to me: rich in detail and setting, but so deeply "true" that I can accept it as presented. As history.
How do you understand this process to work? I think that for the most part this process is very subconscious. As a person is reading, these fine details accumulate over the course of the epic. In building, they create a recognizable world for the reader, a world that however mythical or surreal also has they key elements of "reality" which reflect the reader's world.
By making the epic about Roman history, Virgil makes Aeneas bigger than just a character, in some way representative of...
For a Roman reader, historical references such as these not only enrich the story and setting, but add a level of realism that roots the mythology of the Aeneid in the tangible world of the reader.
I have emailed this new sentence to Rohrbacher to see if I need to add things. Mrao.